PFFV vs. QPFF
PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFFV is passively managed, while QPFF is actively managed. PFFV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
PFFV vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFFV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- —
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFV vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 0.92% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
PFFV vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFV
QPFF
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PFFV
QPFF
Real Estate
PFFV
QPFF
Energy
PFFV
QPFF
-
Basic Materials
PFFV
-
QPFF
Communication Services
PFFV
-
QPFF
Consumer Cyclical
PFFV
-
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
PFFV
-
QPFF
-
Healthcare
PFFV
-
QPFF
-
Industrials
PFFV
-
QPFF
Technology
PFFV
-
QPFF
-
Utilities
PFFV
-
QPFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFV vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
PFFV
QPFF
PFFV vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFV | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFV | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PFFV vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFV | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | 0.00% | -18.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | 0.00% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | 0.00% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility
PFFV vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFV | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 0.00% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 0.00% | +8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 0.00% | +8.68% |
PFFV vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFV vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 8.12% | 8.26% | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.23% | 2.29% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for QPFF.
PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PFFV and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for PFFV and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer