PFFV vs. PGX
PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and PGX (Invesco Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PFFV tracks the ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index while PGX tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFV returned 2.23%/yr vs -0.74%/yr for PGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for PGX.
Performance
PFFV vs. PGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFV achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than PGX's -0.18% return.
PFFV
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- —
PGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
PFFV vs. PGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 2.83% | 2.08% | 9.45% | 10.64% | -13.81% | 6.35% | 13.36% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | -0.18% | 3.48% | 6.53% | 9.48% | -21.16% | 3.15% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFV and PGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PFFV and PGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PFFV vs. PGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFV
PGX
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PFFV
PGX
Real Estate
PFFV
PGX
Energy
PFFV
PGX
-
Basic Materials
PFFV
-
PGX
Communication Services
PFFV
-
PGX
Consumer Cyclical
PFFV
-
PGX
Consumer Defensive
PFFV
-
PGX
-
Healthcare
PFFV
-
PGX
-
Industrials
PFFV
-
PGX
Technology
PFFV
-
PGX
-
Utilities
PFFV
-
PGX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFV vs. PGX — Risk / Return Rank
PFFV
PGX
PFFV vs. PGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) and Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFV | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.06 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 2.35 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFV | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.87 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | -0.07 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.14 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
PFFV vs. PGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFV drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum PGX drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFV and PGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFV | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -66.44% | +47.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.23% | -4.98% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | -11.17% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | -24.67% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -5.29% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -8.13% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 2.24% | -1.09% |
Volatility
PFFV vs. PGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) is 0.80%, while Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that PFFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFV | PGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 1.72% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 4.10% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 6.11% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.84% | 11.11% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 13.02% | -4.34% |
PFFV vs. PGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFV vs. PGX - Dividend Comparison
PFFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than PGX's 6.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 8.12% | 8.26% | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.23% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGX Invesco Preferred ETF | 6.23% | 6.03% | 5.95% | 6.42% | 6.29% | 4.82% | 4.89% | 4.85% | 6.09% | 5.66% | 6.02% | 5.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFV and PGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to PFFV (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFV dropped -18.96% vs PGX's -66.44%.
On 5-year performance, PFFV leads with 2.23% vs -0.74% for PGX. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFFV has performed better with a 2.23% return vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PGX.
PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 6.23% for PGX.
PFFV tracks ICE U.S. Variable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while PGX tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Core Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PFFV and 0.52% for PGX.
PFFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFV and PGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer