PFFRX vs. RCRIX
PFFRX (T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F) and RCRIX (RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 5 years, PFFRX returned 4.98%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for RCRIX. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PFFRX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RCRIX.
Performance
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFRX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than RCRIX's 2.20% return.
PFFRX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.45%
RCRIX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFRX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F | 0.77% | 6.57% | 7.54% | 10.89% | -2.14% | 4.64% | 2.29% | 8.69% | 0.16% | 2.07% |
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 2.20% | 5.56% | 10.01% | 9.85% | -0.72% | 2.81% | -8.51% | 4.46% | 59.17% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFRX and RCRIX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFRX vs. RCRIX — Risk / Return Rank
PFFRX
RCRIX
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFFRX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 4.74 | -3.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 9.68 | -7.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | 104.70 | -97.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum RCRIX drawdown of -30.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFRX and RCRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFRX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -30.00% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -0.45% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.29% | -1.93% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.05% | -3.75% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.45% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -2.95% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 0.04% | +0.41% |
Volatility
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) is 0.31%, while RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund (RCRIX) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that PFFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFRX | RCRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | 0.50% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 0.74% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20% | 0.89% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 1.61% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 7.86% | -4.07% |
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RCRIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFRX vs. RCRIX - Dividend Comparison
PFFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than RCRIX's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFRX T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F | 5.70% | 7.09% | 6.92% | 7.21% | 4.03% | 3.81% | 4.18% | 5.01% | 5.04% | 4.20% | 4.18% | 4.32% |
RCRIX RiverPark Floating Rate CMBS Fund | 4.37% | 5.30% | 6.85% | 7.90% | 3.80% | 2.34% | 3.16% | 3.36% | 49.16% | 3.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFRX and RCRIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCRIX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to PFFRX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFRX dropped -19.70% vs RCRIX's -30.00%.
RCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFRX and RCRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer