PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFRX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFRX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.16% return.


PFFRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.74%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
4.53%
ALL TIME*
4.45%

FLOTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.16%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
0.77%6.57%7.54%10.89%-2.14%4.64%2.29%8.69%-0.45%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.16%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFRX and FLOTX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.31

The correlation between PFFRX and FLOTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFRX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFRX
PFFRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PFFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRXFLOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.28

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

0.93

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

2.32

+5.33

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFRX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFRX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-4.40%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-2.36%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.29%

-3.34%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.05%

-4.40%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.59%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-1.03%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.95%

-0.50%

Volatility

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) is 0.31%, while Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that PFFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.42%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

1.33%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20%

1.68%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.71%

2.69%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

2.44%

+1.35%

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFRX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

PFFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than FLOTX's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.69%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
5.70%7.09%6.92%7.21%4.03%3.81%4.18%5.01%5.04%4.20%4.18%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFRX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOTX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to PFFRX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFRX dropped -19.70% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

PFFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFRX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer