PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFRX vs. JQC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFRX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFRX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than JQC's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PFFRX has underperformed JQC with an annualized return of 4.61%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.75% annualized return.


PFFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.99%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
4.61%

JQC

1D
0.21%
1M
0.62%
6M
-0.78%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
-1.00%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFRX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
0.99%6.57%7.54%10.89%-2.14%4.64%2.29%8.69%0.16%3.66%
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
1.98%-0.36%22.29%15.26%-14.22%13.29%-2.96%21.78%-4.33%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFRX and JQC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2010

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFRX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFRX
PFFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PFFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JQC
JQC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
JQC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
JQC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFRX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFRXJQCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

0.99

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

-0.10

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

-0.19

+9.64

PFFRX vs. JQC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the JQC Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFRX and JQC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFRX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFRX and JQC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFRXJQCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-75.18%

+55.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-10.15%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.29%

-15.37%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.05%

-19.83%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

-47.99%

+28.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-4.16%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-8.79%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

5.24%

-4.79%

Volatility

PFFRX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F (PFFRX) is 0.54%, while Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that PFFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFRXJQCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

1.74%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

8.71%

-7.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

11.17%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

13.13%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

17.51%

-13.72%

PFFRX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFRX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison

PFFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than JQC's 13.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQC
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
13.10%12.91%11.39%11.42%9.71%10.03%16.11%16.14%6.53%7.42%6.99%7.51%
PFFRX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund Class F
6.31%7.09%6.92%7.21%4.03%3.81%4.18%5.01%5.04%4.20%4.18%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFRX and JQC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQC has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to PFFRX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFRX dropped -19.70% vs JQC's -75.18%.

PFFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFRX and JQC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer