PFFR vs. QPFF
PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFFR is passively managed, while QPFF is actively managed. PFFR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
PFFR vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFR vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | -0.34% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
PFFR vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFR
QPFF
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
PFFR
QPFF
Financial Services
PFFR
QPFF
Basic Materials
PFFR
-
QPFF
Communication Services
PFFR
-
QPFF
Consumer Cyclical
PFFR
-
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
PFFR
-
QPFF
-
Energy
PFFR
-
QPFF
-
Healthcare
PFFR
-
QPFF
-
Industrials
PFFR
-
QPFF
Technology
PFFR
-
QPFF
-
Utilities
PFFR
-
QPFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFR vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
PFFR
QPFF
PFFR vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFR | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFR | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PFFR vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFR drawdown since its inception was -53.02%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFR and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFR | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.02% | 0.00% | -53.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | 0.00% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | 0.00% | -7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility
PFFR vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFR | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 0.00% | +7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.47% | 0.00% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 0.00% | +20.54% |
PFFR vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFR vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
PFFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFFR.
PFFR has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PFFR and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for PFFR and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer