PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFD vs. QTPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFD vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than QTPI's 0.84% return.


PFFD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.67%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

QTPI

1D
-0.59%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.41%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFD vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PFFD and QTPI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.62

The correlation between PFFD and QTPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFD vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QTPI
QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFD vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFDQTPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.42

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

9.97

-6.16

PFFD vs. QTPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the QTPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFD and QTPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFDQTPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

1.19

-0.99

Drawdowns

PFFD vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and QTPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFDQTPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-4.08%

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-2.11%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-0.68%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-0.40%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.52%

+1.49%

Volatility

PFFD vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) at 1.42%. This indicates that PFFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFDQTPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

1.42%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.32%

3.19%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.19%

4.55%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

4.98%

+6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.76%

4.98%

+7.78%

PFFD vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFD vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison

PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than QTPI's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.37%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%
QTPI
North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF
4.44%4.58%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFD and QTPI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFD has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to QTPI (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs QTPI's -4.08%.

On 1-year performance, PFFD leads with 7.65% vs 5.09% for QTPI. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PFFD has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.

PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.60% for QTPI.

QTPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFD and QTPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer