PFFD vs. QTPI
PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) and QTPI (North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFFD is passively managed, while QTPI is actively managed. Over the past year, PFFD returned 7.65% vs 5.09% for QTPI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTPI.
Performance
PFFD vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than QTPI's 0.84% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
QTPI
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFD vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | -0.19% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 0.84% | 7.37% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and QTPI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PFFD and QTPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
QTPI
PFFD vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.42 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 9.97 | -6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.19 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and QTPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -4.08% | -26.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -2.11% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -0.68% | -3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -0.40% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 0.52% | +1.49% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) at 1.42%. This indicates that PFFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.42% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 3.19% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 4.55% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 4.98% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 4.98% | +7.78% |
PFFD vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFD vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than QTPI's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 4.44% | 4.58% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFD and QTPI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFFD has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to QTPI (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs QTPI's -4.08%.
On 1-year performance, PFFD leads with 7.65% vs 5.09% for QTPI. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PFFD has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.60% for QTPI.
QTPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFD and QTPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer