PFF vs. DGRO
PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFF is a Preferred Stock fund tracking the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFF returned 2.93%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for DGRO. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PFF charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
PFF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 2.93%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.
PFF
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.72%
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $103.52M | $104.25M | $110.17M | |
| $85.47M | $81.60M | $92.33M |
PFF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 0.89% | 4.87% | 7.24% | 9.22% | -18.19% | 7.15% | 7.89% | 15.93% | -4.64% | 8.10% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.39% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFF and DGRO is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.53 |
The correlation between PFF and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
PFF
DGRO
PFF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.45 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 3.61 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 14.07 | -12.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -35.10% | -30.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -6.47% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.63% | -14.03% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -19.31% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -35.10% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -1.35% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -3.41% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.66% | +0.39% |
Volatility
PFF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) is 2.60%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that PFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFF | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 3.21% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 7.12% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.31% | 9.61% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.40% | 13.79% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 16.58% | -3.88% |
PFF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.89% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 4.97% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to PFF (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.44% vs 2.93% for PFF. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.
PFF has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.
PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFF and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer