PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 2.91%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


PFF

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.86%
6M
-1.60%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.91%

DGRO

1D
0.19%
1M
2.16%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
0.49%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
12.23%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and DGRO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.54

The correlation between PFF and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.42

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.36

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

12.98

-11.58

PFF vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-35.10%

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-6.47%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-14.03%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-19.31%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-35.10%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-0.50%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-3.42%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.67%

+0.21%

Volatility

PFF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.52%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

6.94%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.09%

9.50%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

13.79%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

16.57%

-3.88%

PFF vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than DGRO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.91%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.52%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFF has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.26% vs 2.91% for PFF. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.26% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.

PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 1.91% for DGRO.

PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer