PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 3.35%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


PFF

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.42%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
3.35%

BNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFF vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
2.40%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.02%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and BNDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.26

The correlation between PFF and BNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFF vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFF
BNDX

Financial Services

51.6%
0.0%

Real Estate

10.5%
0.0%

Utilities

8.7%
0.0%

Industrials

5.6%
0.0%

Technology

4.9%

-

Communication Services

3.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Healthcare

1.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Energy

0.4%
0.0%

Financial Services

PFF
51.6%
BNDX
0.0%

Real Estate

PFF
10.5%
BNDX
0.0%

Utilities

PFF
8.7%
BNDX
0.0%

Industrials

PFF
5.6%
BNDX
0.0%

Technology

PFF
4.9%
BNDX

-

Communication Services

PFF
3.4%
BNDX
0.0%

Basic Materials

PFF
1.6%
BNDX

-

Healthcare

PFF
1.4%
BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PFF
1.3%
BNDX

-

Consumer Defensive

PFF
1.2%
BNDX

-

Energy

PFF
0.4%
BNDX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFF vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.10

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

0.66

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

1.84

+2.90

PFF vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFF vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-16.23%

-49.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-2.93%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-2.93%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-15.86%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-16.23%

-17.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.02%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-3.10%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.05%

+0.68%

Volatility

PFF vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.49%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

1.49%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

2.96%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.88%

3.47%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.32%

4.89%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

4.10%

+8.57%

PFF vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFF vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than BNDX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.50%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and BNDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFF has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to BNDX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 10-year performance, PFF leads with 3.35% vs 1.72% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PFF has performed better with a 3.35% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.

PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.50%, compared with 4.47% for BNDX.

PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BNDX is Global Bonds. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.07% for BNDX.

PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer