PFEB vs. PJAN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PFEB (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February) and PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PFEB tracks the S&P 500 while PJAN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFEB returned 8.79%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for PJAN. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

PFEB vs. PJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFEB achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than PJAN's 6.55% return.

PFEB

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 5.32%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 1Y: 13.95%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.11%

PJAN

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.09%
• 6M: 5.43%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 1Y: 13.35%
• 3Y*: 12.42%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	$1.01M	$1.06M	$1.04M
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	$1.99M	$3.42M	$3.75M

PFEB vs. PJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	6.90%	10.65%	12.71%	14.96%	-2.84%	11.52%	6.07%
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January	6.55%	11.29%	13.45%	18.18%	-5.29%	8.80%	7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PFEB and PJAN is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020	0.88

The correlation between PFEB and PJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PFEB vs. PJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFEB

PFEB Risk / Return Rank: 88
PFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PJAN

PJAN Risk / Return Rank: 88
PJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFEB vs. PJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFEB	PJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.26	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.32	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.46	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.90	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.39	15.07	+0.33

PFEB vs. PJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFEB and PJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFEB vs. PJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFEB drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum PJAN drawdown of -21.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFEB and PJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFEB	PJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-21.25%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-4.63%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.58%	-10.49%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.05%	-11.93%	+0.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-1.70%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	0.89%	+0.02%

Volatility

PFEB vs. PJAN - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) have volatilities of 1.55% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFEB	PJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	1.63%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.02%	5.02%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.00%	5.95%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.28%	8.97%	-0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.21%	10.52%	+0.69%

PFEB vs. PJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PFEB and PJAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

PFEB vs. PJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PFEB nor PJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFEB and PJAN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, PFEB and PJAN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PFEB or PJAN?

PJAN has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to PFEB (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFEB dropped -19.98% vs PJAN's -21.25%.

Which ETF is better, PFEB or PJAN?

On 5-year performance, PJAN leads with 8.97% vs 8.79% for PFEB. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFEB or PJAN?

Over the 5-year period, PJAN has performed better with a 8.97% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFEB or PJAN?

PFEB and PJAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFEB or PJAN?

PFEB and PJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PFEB and PJAN?

PFEB tracks S&P 500, while PJAN tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.