PFEB vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PFEB (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFEB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFEB returned 8.74%/yr vs 21.31%/yr for EINC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

PFEB vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFEB achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.77% return.

PFEB

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 11.98%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 28.45%
• YTD: 26.77%
• 1Y: 30.66%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 21.31%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFEB vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	6.31%	10.65%	12.71%	14.96%	-2.84%	11.52%	6.07%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	26.77%	7.11%	42.79%	15.55%	19.18%	38.05%	-18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PFEB and EINC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020	0.39

The correlation between PFEB and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PFEB vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFEB	EINC
Technology	38.4%	-
Financial Services	11.0%	-
Communication Services	10.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.9%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	-
Energy	3.2%	99.4%
Utilities	2.1%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

PFEB vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFEB

PFEB Risk / Return Rank: 84
PFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 78
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFEB vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFEB	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.05	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.78	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	3.98	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.42	9.80	+4.63

PFEB vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFEB and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFEB vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFEB drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFEB and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFEB	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-87.55%	+67.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-7.89%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.58%	-16.01%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.05%	-19.87%	+8.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.89%	+3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-44.02%	+42.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	3.20%	-2.29%

Volatility

PFEB vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) is 1.70%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that PFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFEB	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	6.16%	-4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	12.26%	-7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.01%	15.33%	-9.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.26%	19.58%	-11.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.26%	25.33%	-14.07%

PFEB vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFEB vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

PFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.49%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
PFEB Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFEB and EINC in my portfolio?

PFEB and EINC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFEB or EINC?

EINC has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to PFEB (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFEB dropped -19.98% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, PFEB or EINC?

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.31% vs 8.74% for PFEB. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFEB or EINC?

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.31% return vs 8.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFEB or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFEB or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for PFEB.

What is the main difference between PFEB and EINC?

PFEB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while EINC is Energy Equities. PFEB tracks S&P 500, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PFEB and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.