PEZ vs. VICE
PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. PEZ is passively managed, while VICE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEZ returned 3.14%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for VICE. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for VICE.
Performance
PEZ vs. VICE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than VICE's 4.78% return.
PEZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.88%
VICE
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- -4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.43K | $108.59K | $64.29K | |
| $15.61K | $15.90K | $15.22K |
PEZ vs. VICE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | -1.42% | 5.40% | 20.06% | 29.55% | -29.59% | 20.35% | 38.97% | 18.05% | -6.85% | 0.78% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.78% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEZ and VICE is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PEZ and VICE has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PEZ vs. VICE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEZ
VICE
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEZ
VICE
Communication Services
PEZ
VICE
Healthcare
PEZ
VICE
-
Consumer Defensive
PEZ
VICE
Technology
PEZ
VICE
Real Estate
PEZ
VICE
Industrials
PEZ
VICE
-
Financial Services
PEZ
VICE
-
Basic Materials
PEZ
-
VICE
Energy
PEZ
-
VICE
-
Utilities
PEZ
-
VICE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEZ vs. VICE — Risk / Return Rank
PEZ
VICE
PEZ vs. VICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEZ | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.95 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.38 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | -0.63 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEZ vs. VICE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than VICE's maximum drawdown of -38.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and VICE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEZ | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.39% | -38.27% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -13.59% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -16.55% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.72% | -29.92% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -7.11% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -12.26% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 8.17% | -1.51% |
Volatility
PEZ vs. VICE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEZ | VICE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 4.42% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 10.14% | +4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 13.83% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 17.57% | +6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 19.12% | +5.94% |
PEZ vs. VICE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than VICE's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEZ vs. VICE - Dividend Comparison
PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than VICE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.83% | 0.64% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEZ and VICE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VICE has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to PEZ (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs VICE's -38.27%.
On 5-year performance, PEZ leads with 3.14% vs 1.67% for VICE. On fees, PEZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEZ has performed better with a 3.14% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.24% for PEZ.
PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while VICE is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.99% for VICE.
PEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEZ and VICE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer