PEZ vs. SOXQ
PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEZ returned 14.83%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PEZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | -4.23% | 5.40% | 20.06% | 29.55% | -29.59% | -0.03% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEZ and SOXQ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PEZ and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEZ
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Technology
PEZ
SOXQ
Industrials
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PEZ
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PEZ
SOXQ
Basic Materials
PEZ
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
PEZ
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
PEZ
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEZ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PEZ
SOXQ
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEZ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 5.43 | -5.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 5.22 | -4.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.72 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 11.73 | -11.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 45.01 | -44.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEZ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 5.43 | -5.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.98 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEZ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.39% | -46.01% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -15.59% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -39.36% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | 0.00% | -11.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -12.96% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 4.06% | +1.90% |
Volatility
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEZ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 13.44% | -8.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 26.70% | -11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 33.78% | -13.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 36.38% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 36.38% | -11.32% |
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEZ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.83% | 0.64% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEZ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 14.83% for PEZ. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.
PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEZ and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer