PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 77.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 9.46%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.93% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%

PTF

1D
0.27%
1M
19.05%
YTD
77.58%
6M
74.93%
1Y
109.08%
3Y*
43.28%
5Y*
23.79%
10Y*
26.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
77.58%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and PTF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.73

The correlation between PEZ and PTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEZ vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
PTF

Consumer Cyclical

66.0%

-

Communication Services

11.9%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%

-

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Technology

4.0%
92.9%

Industrials

3.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

0.6%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
66.0%
PTF

-

Communication Services

PEZ
11.9%
PTF
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
8.7%
PTF

-

Healthcare

PEZ
6.9%
PTF

-

Technology

PEZ
4.0%
PTF
92.9%

Industrials

PEZ
3.8%
PTF
1.8%

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
PTF

-

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
PTF
1.4%

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

PTF

-

Energy

PEZ

-

PTF
1.6%

Utilities

PEZ

-

PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEZPTFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

2.86

-2.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

3.15

-2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.44

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

6.10

-5.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.91

24.27

-23.36

PEZ vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEZPTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.86

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.68

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.82

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.54

-0.21

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, which is greater than PTF's maximum drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-55.38%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-17.99%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-36.11%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-44.88%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-44.88%

-7.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

0.00%

-11.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-13.27%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

4.51%

+1.45%

Volatility

PEZ vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

13.27%

-8.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

29.47%

-14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

38.39%

-18.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

34.95%

-10.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

32.94%

-7.88%

PEZ vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PEZ and PTF have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PEZ vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and PTF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 9.46% for PEZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEZ and PTF have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

PEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer