PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 9.46%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.19

The correlation between PEZ and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEZ vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
DBO

Consumer Cyclical

66.0%

-

Communication Services

11.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.7%

-

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Technology

4.0%

-

Industrials

3.8%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

0.6%
116.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
66.0%
DBO

-

Communication Services

PEZ
11.9%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
8.7%
DBO

-

Healthcare

PEZ
6.9%
DBO

-

Technology

PEZ
4.0%
DBO

-

Industrials

PEZ
3.8%
DBO

-

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
DBO

-

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
DBO
116.0%

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

DBO

-

Energy

PEZ

-

DBO

-

Utilities

PEZ

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEZDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.44

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

9.02

-8.11

PEZ vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEZDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.34

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.50

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.36

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.02

+0.30

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-90.18%

+31.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-18.19%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-28.20%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-37.68%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-61.69%

+9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-51.38%

+40.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-62.25%

+48.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

8.92%

-2.96%

Volatility

PEZ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

12.61%

-7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

28.20%

-13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

34.46%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

32.29%

-7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

31.78%

-6.72%

PEZ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 9.46% for PEZ. On fees, PEZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while DBO is Oil & Gas. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer