PEX vs. USO
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.13%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for USO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
PEX vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PEX having a 4.13% annualized return and USO not far behind at 4.07%.
PEX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -12.48%
- 6M
- -10.90%
- 1Y
- -12.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
PEX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -12.48% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and USO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013 | 0.20 |
The correlation between PEX and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
USO
PEX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.38 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 5.01 | -5.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 9.42 | -10.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 2.31 | -3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.68 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.10 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.18 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PEX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -98.19% | +49.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -20.39% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -26.05% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -36.23% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -86.75% | +37.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.90% | -85.01% | +64.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -75.30% | +67.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 10.82% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PEX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) is 4.81%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that PEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 14.87% | -10.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 38.23% | -25.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 44.20% | -28.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 36.06% | -18.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 39.00% | -19.56% |
PEX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 12.81% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and USO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to PEX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, PEX leads with 4.13% vs 4.07% for USO. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, PEX has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PEX has performed better with a 4.13% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 12.81%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
PEX is categorized as Financials Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer