PEX vs. IXG
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while IXG tracks the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.92%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for IXG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXG.
Performance
PEX vs. IXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than IXG's 10.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed IXG with an annualized return of 4.92%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.92%
IXG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.65%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
PEX vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -7.84% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 10.65% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and IXG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PEX and IXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
IXG
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
IXG
Industrials
PEX
IXG
Healthcare
PEX
IXG
Basic Materials
PEX
IXG
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
IXG
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
IXG
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
IXG
-
Energy
PEX
-
IXG
Real Estate
PEX
-
IXG
-
Technology
PEX
-
IXG
Utilities
PEX
-
IXG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
IXG
PEX vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.27 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 1.94 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 6.84 | -7.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and IXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -78.42% | +29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -11.33% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -13.54% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -27.20% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -43.47% | -5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.70% | 0.00% | -16.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -19.66% | +11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.93% | 3.20% | +10.73% |
Volatility
PEX vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 3.42%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.42% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 11.31% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 13.87% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 17.29% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 19.85% | -0.60% |
PEX vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, more than IXG's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.15% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 8.61% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and IXG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to IXG (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs IXG's -78.42%.
On 10-year performance, IXG leads with 13.17% vs 4.92% for PEX. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXG has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 8.61%, compared with 2.15% for IXG.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.46% for IXG.
IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and IXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer