PEX vs. IWDA.L
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.55%/yr vs 13.34%/yr for IWDA.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -10.66% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 4.55%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- -10.66%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- -11.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -10.66% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.48% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.01% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and IWDA.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.53 |
The correlation between PEX and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
IWDA.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PEX
IWDA.L
Industrials
PEX
IWDA.L
Healthcare
PEX
IWDA.L
Basic Materials
PEX
IWDA.L
Communication Services
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Energy
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Real Estate
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Technology
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Utilities
PEX
-
IWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
IWDA.L
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEX | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.34 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.80 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 11.55 | -12.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -34.11% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -8.31% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -16.94% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.88% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -34.11% | -15.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.26% | -1.65% | -17.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -4.41% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 2.02% | +10.65% |
Volatility
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.96% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 9.61% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 12.26% | +3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 15.72% | +2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 15.92% | +3.53% |
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 12.55% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX is categorized as Financials Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for PEX and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer