PETS vs. PSLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.) is a stock, while PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Over the past 10 years, PETS returned -18.42%/yr vs 13.97%/yr for PSLV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PETS vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PETS achieves a -44.38% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PETS has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of -18.42%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.97% annualized return.

PETS

• 1D: -16.43%
• 1M: -21.59%
• YTD: -44.38%
• 6M: 1.14%
• 1Y: -54.94%
• 3Y*: -51.17%
• 5Y*: -42.61%
• 10Y*: -18.42%

PSLV

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: 18.46%
• 1Y: 100.09%
• 3Y*: 41.73%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PETS vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PETS PetMed Express, Inc.	-44.38%	-33.61%	-36.24%	-54.76%	-25.83%	-18.17%	41.49%	6.52%	-47.35%	102.05%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	-1.78%	145.08%	19.43%	-1.94%	2.74%	-14.13%	42.81%	16.99%	-11.83%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PETS and PSLV is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.09

The correlation between PETS and PSLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PETS : $37.44M PSLV : $14.73B
EPS PETS : -$2.74 PSLV : $13.57
PS Ratio PETS : 0.21 PSLV : 218.98
PB Ratio PETS : 1.29 PSLV : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) PETS : $179.02M PSLV : $64.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) PETS : $50.22M PSLV : $404.67M
EBITDA (TTM) PETS : -$46.12M PSLV : $8.21B

Return for Risk

PETS vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PETS

PETS Risk / Return Rank: 11
PETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
PETS Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PETS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PSLV

PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 79
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PETS vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PETS	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	1.72	-2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	1.96	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.32	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	2.48	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	5.50	-7.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PETS vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PETS Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PETS and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PETS	PSLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	1.72	-2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.67	0.52	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.29	0.45	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.17	-0.21

Drawdowns

PETS vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PETS drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PETS and PSLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PETS	PSLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.29%	-79.38%	-18.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.81%	-40.65%	-21.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-89.53%	-40.65%	-48.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.84%	-40.65%	-54.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.40%	-42.79%	-53.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.00%	-36.11%	-59.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.33%	-58.15%	+13.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.90%	18.25%	+17.65%

Volatility

PETS vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) has a higher volatility of 20.05% compared to Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) at 16.57%. This indicates that PETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PETS	PSLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.05%	16.57%	+3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.05%	57.35%	+12.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.63%	58.49%	+40.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.27%	35.64%	+28.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.78%	31.14%	+31.64%

Dividends

PETS vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PETS nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PETS PetMed Express, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.90%	6.78%	4.67%	3.46%	4.59%	4.47%	1.74%	3.25%	4.14%
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PETS and PSLV in my portfolio?

PETS and PSLV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PETS or PSLV?

PETS has higher volatility (20.05%) compared to PSLV (16.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PETS dropped -98.29% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.