PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PETS vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PETS vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PETS achieves a -39.06% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -20.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PETS has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of -18.51%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


PETS

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.52%
6M
-38.87%
YTD
-39.06%
1Y
-39.81%
3Y*
-47.49%
5Y*
-41.07%
10Y*
-18.51%
ALL TIME*
-2.82%

PSLV

1D
-1.98%
1M
-3.34%
6M
-28.81%
YTD
-20.51%
1Y
50.16%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
8.96%
ALL TIME*
4.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$213.81K$289.81K$1.25M
$153.19M$135.68M$193.34M

PETS vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PETS
PetMed Express, Inc.
-39.06%-33.61%-36.24%-54.76%-25.83%-18.17%41.49%6.52%-47.35%102.05%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-20.51%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%-14.13%42.81%16.99%-11.83%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PETS and PSLV is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PETS:

$41.68M

PSLV:

$14.73B

EPS

PETS:

-$2.73

PSLV:

$13.57

PS Ratio

PETS:

0.23

PSLV:

218.98

PB Ratio

PETS:

1.42

PSLV:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

PETS:

$179.02M

PSLV:

$64.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PETS:

$50.22M

PSLV:

$404.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

PETS:

-$46.12M

PSLV:

$8.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PETS vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PETS
PETS Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PETS Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PETS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PETS vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PETSPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.20

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

1.02

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

1.99

-3.09

PETS vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PETS Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PETS and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PETS vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PETS drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PETS and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PETSPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.29%

-79.38%

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.92%

-50.83%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.73%

-50.83%

-36.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.34%

-50.83%

-43.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.40%

-50.83%

-45.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.62%

-48.29%

-47.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.63%

-58.02%

+13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.00%

25.92%

+8.08%

Volatility

PETS vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) is 9.68%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that PETS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PETSPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

11.59%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.29%

55.13%

-21.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.12%

61.20%

+35.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.09%

36.54%

+27.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.97%

31.54%

+31.43%

Dividends

PETS vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither PETS nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PETS
PetMed Express, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.90%6.78%4.67%3.46%4.59%4.47%1.74%3.25%4.14%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PETS and PSLV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLV has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to PETS (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PETS dropped -98.29% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PETS and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer