PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PESPX vs. DRGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PESPX having a 13.87% return and DRGVX slightly higher at 14.17%. Over the past 10 years, PESPX has underperformed DRGVX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while DRGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.


PESPX

1D
0.85%
1M
3.86%
YTD
13.87%
6M
14.02%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
10.94%

DRGVX

1D
1.21%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.17%
6M
15.61%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PESPX
BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund
13.87%6.90%11.88%14.75%-13.67%24.34%13.30%40.74%-10.55%15.99%
DRGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I
14.17%18.48%14.26%12.83%1.51%31.14%3.94%27.04%-10.52%15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PESPX and DRGVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.89

The correlation between PESPX and DRGVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PESPX vs. DRGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PESPX
PESPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PESPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PESPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PESPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PESPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PESPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGVX
DRGVX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DRGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PESPXDRGVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

2.59

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

3.62

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.63

-1.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

17.09

-6.21

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PESPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the DRGVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PESPX and DRGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PESPXDRGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.59

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.87

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.73

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.66

-0.36

Drawdowns

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PESPX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than DRGVX's maximum drawdown of -42.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PESPX and DRGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PESPXDRGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.56%

-42.60%

-18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-6.65%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.18%

-17.01%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-17.01%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-42.60%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-4.34%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.80%

+0.64%

Volatility

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund (PESPX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) at 3.64%. This indicates that PESPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PESPXDRGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.64%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

9.13%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

11.89%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

15.59%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

18.83%

+2.76%

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PESPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DRGVX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PESPX vs. DRGVX - Dividend Comparison

PESPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%, more than DRGVX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I
6.03%6.88%6.87%5.31%7.99%21.73%2.85%3.52%17.87%10.95%2.89%16.07%
PESPX
BNY Mellon MidCap Index Fund
10.75%12.24%11.73%8.19%16.04%15.10%11.21%21.60%14.61%9.22%1.09%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


PESPX and DRGVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PESPX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to DRGVX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PESPX dropped -61.56% vs DRGVX's -42.60%.

DRGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PESPX and DRGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer