PEQSX vs. APGZX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PEQSX (Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6) and APGZX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - PEQSX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while APGZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, PEQSX returned 14.26%/yr vs 15.94%/yr for APGZX. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.52% expense ratio.

Performance

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEQSX achieves a 15.91% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PEQSX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.94% annualized return.

PEQSX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 10.43%
• YTD: 15.91%
• 1Y: 29.46%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 14.93%
• 10Y*: 14.26%
• ALL TIME*: 14.06%

APGZX

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 6.61%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: 15.94%
• ALL TIME*: 15.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PEQSX Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEQSX Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6	15.91%	20.49%	19.41%	15.45%	-2.74%	27.33%	6.23%	29.79%	-8.29%	19.15%
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	4.00%	13.26%	25.47%	35.12%	-28.74%	29.00%	34.47%	34.24%	2.30%	31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PEQSX and APGZX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.70

The correlation between PEQSX and APGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PEQSX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEQSX

PEQSX Risk / Return Rank: 95
PEQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PEQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PEQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PEQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PEQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

APGZX

APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 15
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEQSX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	0.65	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	0.99	+2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.12	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	0.66	+3.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.15	2.30	+14.85

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the APGZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEQSX and APGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEQSX drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEQSX and APGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEQSX	APGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.04%	-33.87%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	-15.21%	+8.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.01%	-21.57%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.18%	-33.87%	+18.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.04%	-33.87%	-2.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.27%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-5.98%	+2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	4.38%	-2.58%

Volatility

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) is 2.92%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that PEQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEQSX	APGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	4.93%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.45%	12.44%	-3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	15.59%	-4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.49%	20.35%	-5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	19.75%	-2.80%

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PEQSX and APGZX have an expense ratio of 0.52%.

Dividends

PEQSX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison

PEQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than APGZX's 9.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	9.39%	9.77%	6.62%	1.69%	0.87%	7.19%	2.60%	3.49%	9.11%	3.78%	2.72%	0.00%
PEQSX Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6	4.83%	5.69%	7.14%	5.26%	7.40%	7.40%	6.30%	3.66%	6.08%	3.56%	2.66%	6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEQSX and APGZX in my portfolio?

PEQSX and APGZX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEQSX or APGZX?

APGZX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PEQSX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEQSX dropped -36.04% vs APGZX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.