PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEQSX vs. LBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEQSX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than LBSAX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PEQSX has outperformed LBSAX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while LBSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.


PEQSX

1D
0.23%
1M
2.85%
YTD
11.31%
6M
10.49%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
14.62%

LBSAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.08%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
11.31%20.49%19.41%15.45%-2.74%27.33%6.23%29.79%-8.29%19.15%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.70%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PEQSX and LBSAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.94

The correlation between PEQSX and LBSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEQSX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEQSX
PEQSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PEQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PEQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEQSXLBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.41

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.84

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

14.45

+0.93

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the LBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEQSX and LBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEQSX drawdown since its inception was -36.04%, smaller than the maximum LBSAX drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEQSX and LBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEQSXLBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.04%

-47.89%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-5.52%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-13.03%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-17.16%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.04%

-32.82%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.03%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-5.24%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.47%

+0.38%

Volatility

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6 (PEQSX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) at 2.65%. This indicates that PEQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEQSXLBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.65%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

6.90%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

9.19%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

13.26%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.70%

+1.32%

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEQSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEQSX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison

PEQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than LBSAX's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.72%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%
PEQSX
Putnam Large Cap Value Fund Class R6
5.05%5.69%7.14%5.26%7.40%7.40%6.30%3.66%6.08%3.56%2.66%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PEQSX and LBSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEQSX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to LBSAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEQSX dropped -36.04% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.

PEQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEQSX and LBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer