PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEPS vs. MRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEPS vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEPS achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 75.79% return.


PEPS

1D
-1.38%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.03%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MRNY

1D
1.61%
1M
20.79%
YTD
75.79%
6M
62.11%
1Y
74.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEPS vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
7.86%20.32%-1.42%
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
75.79%-35.72%-16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PEPS and MRNY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEPS vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNY
MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEPS vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEPSMRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.37

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.10

4.58

+7.52

PEPS vs. MRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEPS and MRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEPS vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEPS drawdown since its inception was -21.26%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEPS and MRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPSMRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-82.15%

+60.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-31.53%

+21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-62.99%

+59.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-52.86%

+50.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

16.26%

-14.09%

Volatility

PEPS vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) is 5.38%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 15.74%. This indicates that PEPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPSMRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

15.74%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

39.32%

-28.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

51.06%

-37.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

51.05%

-32.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

51.05%

-32.62%

PEPS vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEPS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEPS vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison

PEPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than MRNY's 82.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
82.61%145.98%178.49%1.75%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.95%1.00%0.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEPS and MRNY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNY has higher volatility (15.74%) compared to PEPS (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEPS dropped -21.26% vs MRNY's -82.15%.

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 74.19% vs 26.19% for PEPS. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 74.19% return vs 26.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRNY.

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 82.61%, compared with 0.95% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Parametric and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PEPS and 0.99% for MRNY.

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEPS and MRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer