PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEP vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PEP vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than T's -5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has outperformed T with an annualized return of 6.60%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return.


PEP

1D
-0.41%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
2.10%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
-4.27%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*
6.60%

T

1D
-0.90%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
-15.31%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEP vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.10%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%27.38%-4.81%17.82%
T
AT&T Inc.
-5.35%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PEP and T is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.32

The correlation between PEP and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PEP:

$6.37

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

PEP:

22.55

T:

7.55

PEG Ratio

PEP:

7.80

T:

0.31

PS Ratio

PEP:

2.07

T:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

PEP:

$95.45B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PEP:

$51.60B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

PEP:

$15.08B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEP vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEP vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.90

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.70

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

-1.45

+3.84

PEP vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEP and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEP vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.92%

-64.15%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.25%

-21.87%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.17%

-21.87%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

-32.01%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.32%

-42.35%

+12.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.06%

-20.14%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-15.72%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

10.57%

-4.26%

Volatility

PEP vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 5.59%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

7.86%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

17.62%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

21.98%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

24.00%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

23.72%

-4.05%

Dividends

PEP vs. T - Dividend Comparison

PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than T's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
4.00%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.83%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

PEP vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
19.44B
33.47B
(PEP) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PEP and T have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to PEP (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs T's -64.15%.

PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEP and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer