PEP vs. RKT.L
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and RKT.L (Reckitt Benckiser Group plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — PEP in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic, RKT.L in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, PEP returned 6.62%/yr vs -1.47%/yr for RKT.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PEP vs. RKT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PEP is traded in USD, while RKT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RKT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than RKT.L's -24.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has outperformed RKT.L with an annualized return of 6.62%, while RKT.L has yielded a comparatively lower -1.47% annualized return.
PEP
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- -4.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.62%
RKT.L
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -24.46%
- 6M
- -23.92%
- 1Y
- -11.88%
- 3Y*
- -3.78%
- 5Y*
- -4.94%
- 10Y*
- -1.47%
PEP vs. RKT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 2.49% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | -24.46% | 38.93% | -8.30% | 2.15% | -16.82% | -1.24% | 12.77% | 9.01% | -15.91% | 12.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEP and RKT.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
PEP:
$197.79B
RKT.L:
£30.25B
PEP:
$6.37
RKT.L:
£6.17
PEP:
22.64
RKT.L:
7.51
PEP:
7.83
RKT.L:
0.15
PEP:
2.07
RKT.L:
1.25
PEP:
9.25
RKT.L:
3.91
PEP:
$95.45B
RKT.L:
£24.88B
PEP:
$51.60B
RKT.L:
£15.10B
PEP:
$15.08B
RKT.L:
£6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEP vs. RKT.L — Risk / Return Rank
PEP
RKT.L
PEP vs. RKT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEP | RKT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.92 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | -0.39 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | -0.92 | +3.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEP vs. RKT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than RKT.L's maximum drawdown of -44.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and RKT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEP | RKT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.92% | -44.27% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.25% | -30.59% | +14.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.17% | -31.59% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -39.50% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -44.27% | +13.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.75% | -29.60% | +11.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -14.07% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 12.89% | -6.52% |
Volatility
PEP vs. RKT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 5.39%, while Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RKT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEP | RKT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 6.63% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 17.58% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 22.38% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 24.02% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 23.37% | -3.70% |
Dividends
PEP vs. RKT.L - Dividend Comparison
PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than RKT.L's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 3.98% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
RKT.L Reckitt Benckiser Group plc | 9.93% | 3.30% | 3.90% | 3.31% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.98% |
Financials
PEP vs. RKT.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PEP vs. RKT.L - Profitability Comparison
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
RKT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
RKT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
RKT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PEP and RKT.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PEP and RKT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer