PEP vs. GPC
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and GPC (Genuine Parts Company) are both stocks. PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while GPC operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, PEP returned 5.72%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for GPC. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PEP vs. GPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than GPC's 3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 5.72%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.
PEP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.60%
GPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- -4.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $222.96M | $262.69M | $201.67M | |
| $1.15B | $1.26B | $1.24B |
PEP vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | -0.86% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.18% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEP and GPC is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 1983 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
PEP:
$190.64B
GPC:
$17.15B
PEP:
$7.65
GPC:
$0.24
PEP:
18.25
GPC:
526.04
PEP:
1.97
GPC:
0.69
PEP:
8.65
GPC:
3.79
PEP:
$96.90B
GPC:
$25.07B
PEP:
$52.29B
GPC:
$9.08B
PEP:
$18.40B
GPC:
$736.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEP vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank
PEP
GPC
PEP vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEP | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.03 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.00 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | -0.00 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEP vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and GPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEP | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.92% | -54.89% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -37.48% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.94% | -39.72% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -45.70% | +15.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -54.89% | +24.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -26.17% | +5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.66% | -10.36% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.67% | 18.58% | -9.91% |
Volatility
PEP vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) is 7.72%, while Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that PEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEP | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 15.75% | -8.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 29.28% | -12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 32.65% | -11.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 27.92% | -9.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 28.61% | -8.74% |
Dividends
PEP vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison
PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than GPC's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.36% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
PEP vs. GPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PEP vs. GPC - Profitability Comparison
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.11B and revenue of 24.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
GPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.47B and revenue of 6.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
GPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 336.34M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
GPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 227.56M and revenue of 6.54B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PEP and GPC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPC has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to PEP (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs GPC's -54.89%.
PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEP and GPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer