PEO vs. GGINX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PEO (Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund) and GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PEO returned 16.87%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for GGINX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEO charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GGINX.

Performance

PEO vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEO achieves a 17.27% return, which is significantly higher than GGINX's 11.73% return.

PEO

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -7.30%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 6M: 17.54%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 16.87%
• 10Y*: 9.40%

GGINX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 15.35%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEO vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	17.27%	9.98%	13.58%	0.91%	41.77%	53.75%	-26.37%	20.96%	-23.11%	4.65%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	11.73%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PEO and GGINX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.46

The correlation between PEO and GGINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PEO vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEO

PEO Risk / Return Rank: 28
PEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PEO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PEO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 42
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEO vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEO	GGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.51	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.16	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.26	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	2.93	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	8.22	-2.06

PEO vs. GGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the GGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEO and GGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEO vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEO drawdown since its inception was -71.88%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEO and GGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEO	GGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.88%	-35.80%	-36.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-5.59%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-15.39%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.30%	-24.21%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.90%	-2.86%	-9.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-5.88%	-9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	1.98%	+1.93%

Volatility

PEO vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison

Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund (PEO) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) at 3.60%. This indicates that PEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEO	GGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	3.60%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	8.75%	+6.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.63%	10.86%	+6.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	19.72%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.32%	18.96%	+8.36%

PEO vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEO vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison

PEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than GGINX's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.00%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%
PEO Adams Natural Resources Closed Fund	8.20%	9.43%	8.14%	6.54%	7.48%	5.51%	6.42%	6.68%	5.63%	5.95%	5.65%	7.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEO and GGINX in my portfolio?

PEO and GGINX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEO or GGINX?

PEO has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to GGINX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEO dropped -71.88% vs GGINX's -35.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.