PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PEMX vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PEMX vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
9.03%34.01%17.21%15.13%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.20%22.74%11.92%11.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 3.20% return.


PEMX

1D
4.10%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
9.03%
6M
19.84%
1Y
50.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UEVM

1D
2.22%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
3.20%
6M
4.71%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PEMX vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEMXUEVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.47

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

2.00

+1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.06

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

8.65

+5.59

PEMX vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and UEVM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEMXUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.47

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

0.30

+1.27

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and UEVM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PEMX vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than UEVM's 3.74% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
6.42%7.00%5.00%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.74%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and UEVM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-45.44%

+30.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.45%

-12.47%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.94%

-7.37%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-11.86%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.97%

+0.51%

Volatility

PEMX vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 7.82%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PEMXUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

7.82%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

11.81%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.48%

17.59%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

15.85%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

18.42%

-1.26%