PEMX vs. UEVM
PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. PEMX is actively managed, while UEVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 34.73%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for UEVM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
PEMX vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 40.36% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
PEMX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- 40.36%
- 6M
- 45.50%
- 1Y
- 75.31%
- 3Y*
- 34.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
PEMX vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 40.36% | 34.01% | 17.21% | 15.13% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEMX and UEVM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PEMX and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEMX vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEMX
UEVM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
PEMX
UEVM
Financial Services
PEMX
UEVM
Industrials
PEMX
UEVM
Communication Services
PEMX
UEVM
Utilities
PEMX
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
PEMX
UEVM
Basic Materials
PEMX
UEVM
Healthcare
PEMX
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
PEMX
UEVM
Real Estate
PEMX
UEVM
Energy
PEMX
-
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEMX vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
PEMX
UEVM
PEMX vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.30 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | 2.56 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.66 | 8.65 | +12.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52 | 1.65 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.33 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
PEMX vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -45.44% | +30.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -9.79% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -18.88% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -2.18% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -11.67% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.89% | +0.77% |
Volatility
PEMX vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEMX | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 5.15% | +4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.73% | 12.13% | +6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 15.18% | +6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 15.90% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 18.39% | -0.21% |
PEMX vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEMX vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 4.99% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEMX and UEVM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEMX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 3-year performance, PEMX leads with 34.73% vs 18.34% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 34.73% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.
PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 3.05% for UEVM.
PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.45% for UEVM.
PEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEMX and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer