PEMX vs. FRDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. PEMX is actively managed, while FRDM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 34.73%/yr vs 37.08%/yr for FRDM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FRDM.

Performance

PEMX vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 40.36% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 44.61% return.

PEMX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 11.09%
• YTD: 40.36%
• 6M: 45.50%
• 1Y: 75.31%
• 3Y*: 34.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRDM

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 17.06%
• YTD: 44.61%
• 6M: 53.16%
• 1Y: 97.46%
• 3Y*: 37.08%
• 5Y*: 19.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	40.36%	34.01%	17.21%	15.13%
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	44.61%	61.27%	1.70%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and FRDM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.87

The correlation between PEMX and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEMX vs. FRDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEMX	FRDM
Technology	45.0%	41.1%
Financial Services	24.4%	22.1%
Industrials	8.6%	8.6%
Communication Services	6.6%	3.9%
Utilities	4.5%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	7.8%
Basic Materials	2.8%	7.4%
Healthcare	1.9%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.9%	2.5%
Energy	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

PEMX vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX

PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FRDM

FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 93
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEMX	FRDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	4.00	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	4.65	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.67	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	5.81	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	23.37	-2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEMX vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is comparable to the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEMX	FRDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	4.00	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	0.85	+1.13

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and FRDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEMX	FRDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-40.49%	+25.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.45%	-16.87%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	-16.87%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.30%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-7.09%	+4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.18%	-0.52%

Volatility

PEMX vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) is 9.67%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that PEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEMX	FRDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.67%	11.03%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.73%	21.65%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.51%	24.50%	-2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	20.80%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	22.77%	-4.59%

PEMX vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEMX vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than FRDM's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	1.51%	2.26%	2.53%	2.66%	2.72%	2.17%	1.11%	1.07%
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	4.99%	7.00%	5.00%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEMX and FRDM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PEMX and FRDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PEMX or FRDM?

FRDM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to PEMX (9.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

Which ETF is better, PEMX or FRDM?

On 3-year performance, FRDM leads with 37.08% vs 34.73% for PEMX. On fees, FRDM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PEMX has been the lower-risk option at 9.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEMX or FRDM?

Over the 3-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 37.08% return vs 34.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEMX or FRDM?

FRDM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEMX or FRDM?

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 1.51% for FRDM.

What is the main difference between PEMX and FRDM?

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.49% for FRDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 3.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.