PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEMX vs. EVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEMX vs. EVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PEMX having a 26.42% return and EVLU slightly lower at 26.39%.


PEMX

1D
1.09%
1M
-7.11%
6M
15.00%
YTD
26.42%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.45%

EVLU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.50%
6M
16.81%
YTD
26.39%
1Y
52.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$154.42K$144.62K$121.49K
$78.06K$81.41K$258.35K

PEMX vs. EVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
26.42%34.01%0.72%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
26.39%38.54%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and EVLU is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.78

The correlation between PEMX and EVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEMX vs. EVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEMX
PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEMX vs. EVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEMXEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.01

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

11.62

-2.61

PEMX vs. EVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and EVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. EVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -19.04%, which is greater than EVLU's maximum drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and EVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEMXEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.04%

-17.17%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-12.90%

-6.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.50%

-7.82%

-6.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-3.75%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

4.44%

+0.83%

Volatility

PEMX vs. EVLU - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) at 6.36%. This indicates that PEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEMXEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.79%

6.36%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.23%

18.46%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.22%

20.91%

+6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

20.37%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

20.37%

-0.14%

PEMX vs. EVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EVLU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEMX vs. EVLU - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, more than EVLU's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.85%5.20%1.03%0.00%
PEMX
Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
5.54%7.00%5.00%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEMX and EVLU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEMX has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to EVLU (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -19.04% vs EVLU's -17.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 52.71% vs 48.11% for PEMX. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 52.71% return vs 48.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 3.85% for EVLU.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEMX and EVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer