PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEGA vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEGA vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEGA achieves a -45.08% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PEGA has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 9.23%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.


PEGA

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-45.08%
6M
-44.99%
1Y
-33.56%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
-12.80%
10Y*
9.23%

URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEGA vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEGA
Pegasystems Inc.
-45.08%28.39%91.01%43.07%-69.29%-16.01%67.51%66.81%1.66%31.28%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PEGA and URA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010

0.35

The correlation between PEGA and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEGA vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEGA
PEGA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEGA vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PEGAURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.14

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

1.04

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

2.30

-3.64

PEGA vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEGA Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEGA and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PEGA vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEGA drawdown since its inception was -94.81%, roughly equal to the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEGA and URA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEGAURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.81%

-93.54%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.84%

-31.48%

-19.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.84%

-37.81%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.59%

-37.90%

-40.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.21%

-61.45%

-17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.86%

-48.34%

-6.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-74.94%

+30.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.39%

14.12%

+12.27%

Volatility

PEGA vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) is 12.27%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that PEGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEGAURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.27%

17.69%

-5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.25%

39.95%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.03%

51.24%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.50%

43.96%

+7.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.02%

37.91%

+6.11%

Dividends

PEGA vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

PEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than URA's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEGA
Pegasystems Inc.
0.37%0.15%0.10%0.25%0.35%0.11%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.25%0.33%0.44%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEGA and URA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to PEGA (12.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEGA dropped -94.81% vs URA's -93.54%.

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEGA and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer