PEFIX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund (PEFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
PEFIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 25, 2008. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEFIX PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund | 6.47% | 27.34% | 7.08% | 20.00% | -16.85% | 20.69% | 5.27% | 14.80% | -13.51% | 31.80% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.47% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 23.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEFIX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than GLLSX's 5.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PEFIX having a 11.54% annualized return and GLLSX not far ahead at 11.57%.
PEFIX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 32.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEFIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PEFIX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
PEFIX
GLLSX
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund (PEFIX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.46 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 3.02 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 3.15 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 13.47 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.46 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.71 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.55 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEFIX and GLLSX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
PEFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEFIX PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund | 4.23% | 3.73% | 9.33% | 2.11% | 18.29% | 46.03% | 8.19% | 0.38% | 4.76% | 7.08% | 4.48% | 0.00% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.78% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEFIX drawdown since its inception was -51.44%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEFIX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.44% | -32.59% | -18.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -14.39% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.17% | -30.02% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.44% | -32.59% | -18.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -14.39% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -7.99% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 3.36% | +0.14% |
Volatility
PEFIX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund (PEFIX) is 6.72%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that PEFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEFIX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 10.78% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 15.60% | -4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 19.51% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 17.21% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 17.34% | -0.46% |