PEAFX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PEAFX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 5, 2015. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 7.99% | 20.25% | 1.14% | 22.28% | -10.71% | 15.47% | 6.43% | 13.30% | -12.77% | 28.91% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -1.93% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PEAFX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.80% annualized return.
PEAFX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PEAFX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PEAFX
PFORX
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEAFX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 0.61 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 0.86 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.12 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 0.66 | +1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 2.97 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEAFX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.61 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.33 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.91 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.25 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEAFX and PFORX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than PFORX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 2.75% | 2.97% | 1.01% | 4.01% | 11.33% | 9.19% | 7.05% | 2.48% | 11.05% | 8.07% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.86% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEAFX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.18% | -13.87% | -33.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -3.99% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.57% | -13.71% | -14.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.18% | -13.87% | -33.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -3.39% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -1.95% | -8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 0.89% | +2.21% |
Volatility
PEAFX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.99%. This indicates that PEAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEAFX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 1.99% | +3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 2.55% | +8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 3.39% | +12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 3.47% | +11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 3.08% | +14.16% |