PEAFX vs. GSIYX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PEAFX (PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A) and GSIYX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - PEAFX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by PIMCO, while GSIYX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World ex USA Growth (Net). PEAFX is actively managed, while GSIYX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEAFX returned 7.84%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for GSIYX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PEAFX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSIYX.

Performance

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than GSIYX's 8.15% return.

PEAFX

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 2.64%
• 6M: 1.34%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 1Y: 19.17%
• 3Y*: 11.69%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 9.35%
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

GSIYX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.02%
• 6M: 4.43%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 1Y: 15.65%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A	11.38%	20.25%	1.14%	22.28%	-10.71%	15.47%	6.43%	13.30%	-12.77%	28.91%
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	8.15%	20.89%	9.69%	22.07%	-10.99%	12.47%	15.86%	27.59%	-6.02%	29.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PEAFX and GSIYX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between PEAFX and GSIYX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PEAFX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEAFX

PEAFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PEAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PEAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PEAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PEAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PEAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GSIYX

GSIYX Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
GSIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GSIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
GSIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GSIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEAFX	GSIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.60	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.20	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.29	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.01	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	5.51	-1.38

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the GSIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEAFX and GSIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, which is greater than GSIYX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and GSIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEAFX	GSIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.18%	-28.79%	-18.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-7.81%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.22%	-10.30%	-11.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.16%	-25.36%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-2.17%	-3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-4.80%	-5.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	2.85%	+1.04%

Volatility

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 2.75%. This indicates that PEAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEAFX	GSIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	2.75%	+2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	8.20%	+4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	9.88%	+5.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	14.27%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	15.62%	+1.43%

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEAFX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison

PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than GSIYX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6	4.76%	5.14%	11.21%	2.38%	4.91%	2.25%	0.19%	0.67%	0.55%	0.16%	0.00%
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A	2.67%	2.97%	1.01%	4.01%	11.33%	9.19%	7.05%	2.48%	11.05%	8.07%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEAFX and GSIYX in my portfolio?

PEAFX and GSIYX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEAFX or GSIYX?

PEAFX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to GSIYX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEAFX dropped -47.18% vs GSIYX's -28.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.