PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKFX vs. JEMWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHKFX having a 20.27% return and JEMWX slightly higher at 21.14%.


FHKFX

1D
4.05%
1M
-3.49%
6M
8.95%
YTD
20.27%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.80%

JEMWX

1D
4.26%
1M
-4.50%
6M
9.88%
YTD
21.14%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
8.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
20.27%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
21.14%40.40%3.61%7.42%-25.61%-10.20%35.00%32.20%-8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKFX and JEMWX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FHKFX and JEMWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKFX vs. JEMWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMWX
JEMWX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JEMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHKFXJEMWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.92

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

10.38

-1.67

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the JEMWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKFX and JEMWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKFX drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, smaller than the maximum JEMWX drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKFX and JEMWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKFXJEMWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-49.42%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-14.85%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-15.01%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.01%

-43.28%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.03%

-11.22%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-17.28%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

4.17%

+0.26%

Volatility

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) is 9.54%, while JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that FHKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKFXJEMWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

10.64%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.41%

22.39%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

24.78%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

20.23%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

19.90%

+0.28%

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than JEMWX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHKFX vs. JEMWX - Dividend Comparison

FHKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than JEMWX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.98%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
1.17%1.42%1.63%1.67%0.67%4.01%0.18%0.88%1.05%0.55%0.89%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FHKFX and JEMWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JEMWX has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to FHKFX (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKFX dropped -45.47% vs JEMWX's -49.42%.

JEMWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKFX and JEMWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer