PEAFX vs. EMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PEAFX (PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A) and EMF (Templeton Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEAFX returned 11.41%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for EMF. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEAFX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for EMF.

Performance

PEAFX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 41.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PEAFX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 11.41%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.

PEAFX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 18.16%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

EMF

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: 14.71%
• YTD: 41.37%
• 6M: 49.61%
• 1Y: 93.36%
• 3Y*: 36.22%
• 5Y*: 11.63%
• 10Y*: 15.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEAFX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A	18.16%	20.25%	1.14%	22.28%	-10.71%	15.47%	6.43%	13.30%	-12.77%	28.91%
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund	41.37%	58.20%	6.56%	8.84%	-21.53%	-8.23%	24.48%	27.20%	-14.78%	53.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PEAFX and EMF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.76

The correlation between PEAFX and EMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PEAFX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEAFX

PEAFX Risk / Return Rank: 56
PEAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PEAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PEAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PEAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PEAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EMF

EMF Risk / Return Rank: 94
EMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EMF Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EMF Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEAFX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEAFX	EMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	4.12	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	4.88	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.73	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	4.82	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.66	19.26	-8.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEAFX vs. EMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the EMF Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEAFX and EMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEAFX	EMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	4.12	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.57	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.76	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.23	+0.47

Drawdowns

PEAFX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and EMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEAFX	EMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.18%	-76.97%	+29.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-19.48%	+9.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.22%	-19.48%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.57%	-45.62%	+17.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.18%	-47.65%	+0.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.78%	+1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-29.00%	+18.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	4.87%	-1.90%

Volatility

PEAFX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) is 4.63%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that PEAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEAFX	EMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	9.22%	-4.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.86%	20.12%	-8.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	22.81%	-8.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	20.50%	-5.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	20.58%	-3.45%

PEAFX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEAFX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison

PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than EMF's 6.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund	6.97%	9.73%	4.28%	6.22%	9.89%	6.92%	3.51%	7.36%	5.92%	12.11%	1.62%	12.81%
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A	2.52%	2.97%	1.01%	4.01%	11.33%	9.19%	7.05%	2.48%	11.05%	8.07%	2.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEAFX and EMF in my portfolio?

PEAFX and EMF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEAFX or EMF?

EMF has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to PEAFX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEAFX dropped -47.18% vs EMF's -76.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.