PDX vs. SRV
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV).
PDX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2019. SRV is an actively managed fund by NXG. It was launched on Aug 24, 2007.
Performance
PDX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 19.83% | -10.59% | 36.99% | 44.51% | 23.02% | 68.79% | -44.20% | -10.78% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 17.58% | 5.05% | 52.30% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 13.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDX achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly higher than SRV's 17.58% return.
PDX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 19.83%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SRV
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.55%
- 5Y*
- 27.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDX has a 2.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
PDX
SRV
PDX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.97 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.25 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.14 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 3.53 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.97 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.02 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDX and SRV is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PDX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
PDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.72%, more than SRV's 16.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund | 20.72% | 24.34% | 6.31% | 4.30% | 5.89% | 5.28% | 14.11% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 16.95% | 19.31% | 13.86% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Drawdowns
PDX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDX drawdown since its inception was -80.63%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDX and SRV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.63% | -92.93% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -18.46% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.24% | -26.26% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.96% | -16.68% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.92% | -48.80% | +29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | 5.96% | +2.29% |
Volatility
PDX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) is 4.60%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that PDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 6.47% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 13.33% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.72% | 22.19% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.78% | 26.19% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.86% | 38.32% | -1.46% |