PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDT vs. JEMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDT vs. JEMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly lower than JEMMX's 31.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has underperformed JEMMX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while JEMMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


PDT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.30%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
6.12%

JEMMX

1D
1.17%
1M
11.93%
YTD
31.30%
6M
33.44%
1Y
51.11%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDT vs. JEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
3.84%7.64%29.92%-9.55%-16.30%25.98%-14.20%39.29%-12.49%21.22%
JEMMX
John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund
31.30%20.07%5.42%4.49%-27.34%-7.48%32.74%26.42%-17.01%41.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PDT and JEMMX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDT vs. JEMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDT
PDT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

JEMMX
JEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDT vs. JEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDTJEMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.49

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.66

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

14.58

-12.67

PDT vs. JEMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the JEMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDT and JEMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDTJEMMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.62

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.12

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.46

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Drawdowns

PDT vs. JEMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, which is greater than JEMMX's maximum drawdown of -49.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and JEMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDTJEMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.39%

-49.23%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.38%

-13.91%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-19.00%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.44%

-45.65%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.39%

-49.23%

-13.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

0.00%

-4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-19.60%

+9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.48%

-1.15%

Volatility

PDT vs. JEMMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) is 3.08%, while John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that PDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDTJEMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

8.39%

-5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

17.01%

-10.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.93%

19.43%

-10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

18.84%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.16%

19.25%

+5.91%

PDT vs. JEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDT has a 5.06% expense ratio, which is higher than JEMMX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDT vs. JEMMX - Dividend Comparison

PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than JEMMX's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMMX
John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.55%2.03%0.42%1.56%1.21%11.32%4.02%2.25%7.89%1.06%0.43%0.00%
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
7.75%7.80%7.77%10.14%9.04%6.42%8.43%6.70%8.69%9.94%9.15%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDT and JEMMX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMMX has higher volatility (8.39%) compared to PDT (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDT dropped -62.39% vs JEMMX's -49.23%.

JEMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDT and JEMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer