PDP vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PDP tracks the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index while PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDP returned 13.60%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for PRN. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

PDP vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 13.60%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.

PDP

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 24.95%
• 6M: 24.18%
• 1Y: 37.20%
• 3Y*: 24.44%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

PRN

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 41.80%
• 6M: 45.38%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 20.18%
• 10Y*: 18.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	24.95%	8.37%	26.06%	20.88%	-24.49%	7.72%	36.59%	33.13%	-5.96%	23.30%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	41.80%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and PRN is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2007	0.86

The correlation between PDP and PRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDP vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PDP	PRN
Industrials	39.2%	79.3%
Technology	26.9%	19.4%
Healthcare	6.5%	-
Energy	6.3%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	1.2%
Financial Services	4.4%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.8%
Communication Services	2.2%	-
Utilities	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-

Return for Risk

PDP vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP

PDP Risk / Return Rank: 53
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDP	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.29	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.86	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	4.63	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	15.45	-4.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDP vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDP	PRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.29	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.81	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.77	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.52	-0.07

Drawdowns

PDP vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, roughly equal to the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDP	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.34%	-59.88%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-14.15%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.79%	-30.78%	+6.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.91%	-34.84%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.70%	-36.27%	+1.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.47%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-10.84%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	4.23%	-0.89%

Volatility

PDP vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) is 6.51%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that PDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDP	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	10.95%	-4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.34%	23.22%	-5.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.94%	28.66%	-6.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.00%	25.03%	-3.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.59%	24.17%	-2.58%

PDP vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDP vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, which matches PRN's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.15%	0.42%	0.45%	0.00%	0.11%	0.25%	0.18%	0.28%	0.81%	0.39%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDP and PRN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PDP and PRN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PDP or PRN?

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to PDP (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, PDP or PRN?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 13.60% for PDP. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PDP has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PDP or PRN?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDP or PRN?

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PDP or PRN?

PDP and PRN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.11%.

What is the main difference between PDP and PRN?

PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.60% for PRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.