PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. AVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. AVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than AVDS's 12.02% return.


PDN

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.91%
YTD
10.22%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.41%

AVDS

1D
-1.09%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.02%
6M
15.40%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDN vs. AVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
10.22%38.34%0.57%3.09%
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
12.02%38.18%3.20%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and AVDS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2023

0.97

The correlation between PDN and AVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. AVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
AVDS

Industrials

22.4%
22.6%

Financial Services

11.4%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
12.8%

Technology

10.3%
9.7%

Basic Materials

10.0%
17.0%

Real Estate

8.6%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
4.5%

Energy

5.1%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.9%

Utilities

2.4%
3.2%

Industrials

PDN
22.4%
AVDS
22.6%

Financial Services

PDN
11.4%
AVDS
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
11.1%
AVDS
12.8%

Technology

PDN
10.3%
AVDS
9.7%

Basic Materials

PDN
10.0%
AVDS
17.0%

Real Estate

PDN
8.6%
AVDS
3.2%

Healthcare

PDN
5.4%
AVDS
4.5%

Energy

PDN
5.1%
AVDS
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
4.7%
AVDS
5.1%

Communication Services

PDN
3.3%
AVDS
2.9%

Utilities

PDN
2.4%
AVDS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. AVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDS
AVDS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDN vs. AVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDNAVDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.21

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.68

3.04

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.63

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.64

10.24

-0.60

PDN vs. AVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the AVDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and AVDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDNAVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.21

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

1.26

-0.99

Drawdowns

PDN vs. AVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, which is greater than AVDS's maximum drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and AVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNAVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-13.51%

-45.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.44%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-1.73%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-2.84%

-8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.19%

-0.31%

Volatility

PDN vs. AVDS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) at 4.46%. This indicates that PDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNAVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.46%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

12.43%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

14.87%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

15.36%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

15.36%

+1.70%

PDN vs. AVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. AVDS - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than AVDS's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
2.16%2.37%3.07%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.08%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PDN and AVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDN has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to AVDS (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs AVDS's -13.51%.

On 1-year performance, AVDS leads with 32.62% vs 27.72% for PDN. On fees, AVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AVDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVDS has performed better with a 32.62% return vs 27.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

PDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.16% for AVDS.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.30% for AVDS.

AVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and AVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer