PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDJGX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDJGX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 7.17% return.


PDJGX

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
10.93%
6M
9.86%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
7.17%
6M
6.21%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDJGX
Prudential Day One 2050 Fund
10.93%18.35%33.43%17.95%-15.32%19.33%11.29%23.82%-8.82%19.59%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.17%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PDJGX and PLTZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PDJGX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDJGX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDJGX
PDJGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PDJGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDJGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDJGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PDJGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDJGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDJGXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.09

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

9.10

+2.67

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDJGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDJGX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDJGX drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDJGX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDJGXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-34.01%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.70%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.42%

-15.73%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-26.79%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-2.28%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-4.61%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.99%

-0.02%

Volatility

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2050 Fund (PDJGX) is 4.71%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that PDJGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDJGXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

5.06%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

10.43%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

12.54%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

15.59%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

15.97%

+0.81%

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDJGX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PDJGX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

PDJGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than PLTZX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDJGX
Prudential Day One 2050 Fund
3.85%4.27%34.20%3.81%8.60%11.14%1.96%4.52%4.89%2.18%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.78%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PDJGX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to PDJGX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDJGX dropped -33.11% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

PDJGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDJGX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer