PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while PSU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIV.TO achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than PSU-U.TO's 2.45% return.


PDIV.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
3.01%
YTD
7.79%
6M
8.18%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
9.31%

PSU-U.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.35%
YTD
2.45%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
7.79%15.82%10.71%4.64%-4.40%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-8.79%
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.45%-1.75%12.58%1.64%8.73%-0.62%-1.27%-3.31%7.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIV.TO and PSU-U.TO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PSU-U.TO
PSU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIV.TOPSU-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.18

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.10

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.60

2.85

+13.75

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIV.TO and PSU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIV.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

0.98

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.46

+0.16

Drawdowns

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, which is greater than PSU-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIV.TO and PSU-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIV.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.64%

-16.93%

-13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-4.07%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.61%

-5.47%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.96%

-5.47%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.59%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-4.86%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.57%

-0.39%

Volatility

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO) at 0.80%. This indicates that PDIV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIV.TOPSU-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

0.80%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.39%

3.43%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

4.58%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

6.32%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

6.56%

+7.33%

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIV.TO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PSU-U.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDIV.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.78%, more than PSU-U.TO's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
11.78%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
PSU-U.TO
Purpose US Cash Fund
2.70%2.90%3.65%3.87%1.45%0.29%0.41%1.70%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDIV.TO and PSU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSU-U.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSU-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for PDIV.TO.

PDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while PSU-U.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for PDIV.TO and 0.17% for PSU-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIV.TO and PSU-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer