PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIV.TO vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
1.14%15.82%10.71%4.64%-4.40%20.18%-1.15%23.57%-15.24%26.84%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
6.77%15.62%9.82%16.46%-6.10%14.29%2.30%13.06%-9.44%28.72%
Different Trading Currencies

PDIV.TO is traded in CAD, while DGS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIV.TO achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than DGS's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PDIV.TO has underperformed DGS with an annualized return of 8.91%, while DGS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.


PDIV.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.00%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
8.91%

DGS

1D
2.60%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
6.77%
6M
6.58%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIV.TO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PDIV.TO vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIV.TODGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.61

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

2.17

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.20

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.94

8.46

+0.48

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIV.TO and DGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIV.TODGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.61

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.80

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.61

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between PDIV.TO and DGS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.30%, more than DGS's 3.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
12.30%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.49%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Drawdowns

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIV.TO and DGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIV.TODGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.64%

-61.83%

+31.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-10.99%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.96%

-24.86%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.64%

-44.08%

+13.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-7.62%

+4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-12.68%

+8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.96%

-1.33%

Volatility

PDIV.TO vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) is 3.48%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that PDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PDIV.TODGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

8.30%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.58%

11.11%

-5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

15.43%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.89%

12.22%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.96%

14.69%

-0.73%