PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIHX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2045 Fund (PDIHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIHX achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 12.32% return.


PDIHX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.10%
YTD
11.30%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDIHX
Prudential Day One 2045 Fund
11.30%17.57%28.05%14.60%-15.03%19.03%11.36%23.64%-8.34%19.70%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%16.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIHX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PDIHX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIHX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIHX
PDIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PDIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2045 Fund (PDIHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIHXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.31

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

14.68

-0.69

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIHX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIHXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.65

+0.10

Drawdowns

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIHX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIHX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIHXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-32.53%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-8.50%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-15.27%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-25.64%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-4.56%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.91%

-0.12%

Volatility

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2045 Fund (PDIHX) is 3.16%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that PDIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIHXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.34%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

8.96%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

11.27%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

14.77%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

15.99%

+0.27%

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIHX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PDIHX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

PDIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
PDIHX
Prudential Day One 2045 Fund
3.70%4.12%27.95%1.57%7.68%14.45%2.04%5.42%6.13%2.18%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PDIHX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PDIHX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDIHX dropped -32.31% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIHX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer