PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDHJX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2040 Fund (PDHJX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDHJX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return.


PDHJX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.20%
YTD
10.13%
6M
9.89%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*

LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.74%
6M
2.70%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDHJX
Prudential Day One 2040 Fund
10.13%16.40%27.24%16.15%-14.36%18.30%11.03%22.91%-7.24%18.62%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PDHJX and LTTIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between PDHJX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDHJX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDHJX
PDHJX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PDHJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDHJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDHJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PDHJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDHJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2040 Fund (PDHJX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDHJXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.47

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

10.68

+2.96

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDHJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDHJX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDHJX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDHJX and LTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDHJXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-19.33%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-3.64%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.20%

-5.77%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.18%

-16.92%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.45%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-2.68%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.84%

+0.77%

Volatility

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Prudential Day One 2040 Fund (PDHJX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that PDHJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDHJXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

1.34%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

3.32%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

4.18%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.71%

6.37%

+7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

7.24%

+6.77%

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDHJX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PDHJX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

PDHJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%
PDHJX
Prudential Day One 2040 Fund
4.21%4.64%27.63%4.01%9.43%10.33%2.22%5.39%5.02%2.18%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDHJX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDHJX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDHJX dropped -30.28% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

PDHJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDHJX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer