PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO
PDF.TO (Purpose Core Dividend Fund) and PBI.TO (Purpose Best Ideas Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PDF.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while PBI.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDF.TO returned 9.50%/yr vs 10.19%/yr for PBI.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDF.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for PBI.TO.
Performance
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDF.TO achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than PBI.TO's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PDF.TO has underperformed PBI.TO with an annualized return of 9.50%, while PBI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.19% annualized return.
PDF.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- YTD
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.45%
PBI.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
PBI.TO Purpose Best Ideas Fund | CA$35.55K | CA$37.47K | CA$25.30K |
| CA$201.50K | CA$240.90K | CA$226.04K |
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund | 20.07% | 20.44% | 13.61% | 4.13% | -1.74% | 24.35% | -0.79% | 23.25% | -11.14% | 7.37% |
PBI.TO Purpose Best Ideas Fund | 3.12% | 19.19% | 23.26% | 37.57% | -39.67% | 10.70% | 23.07% | 35.93% | -11.92% | 22.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDF.TO and PBI.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2014 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PDF.TO
PBI.TO
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and Purpose Best Ideas Fund (PBI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDF.TO | PBI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.12 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.26 | 0.54 | +4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.86 | 1.76 | +22.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDF.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum PBI.TO drawdown of -47.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDF.TO and PBI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDF.TO | PBI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.00% | -47.87% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -16.18% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.28% | -20.01% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.81% | -47.87% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.00% | -47.87% | +11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -4.05% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -10.08% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 4.97% | -3.57% |
Volatility
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) is 2.48%, while Purpose Best Ideas Fund (PBI.TO) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that PDF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDF.TO | PBI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 4.30% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.86% | 13.37% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 15.88% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.33% | 22.24% | -11.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 22.00% | -8.42% |
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDF.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than PBI.TO's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDF.TO vs. PBI.TO - Dividend Comparison
PDF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while PBI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBI.TO Purpose Best Ideas Fund | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund | 2.79% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 4.17% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.84% | 3.65% | 4.33% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDF.TO and PBI.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PDF.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PDF.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for PBI.TO.
PDF.TO is categorized as Dividend, while PBI.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PDF.TO and 0.82% for PBI.TO.
Find the right allocation for PDF.TO and PBI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer