PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PDF.TO (Purpose Core Dividend Fund) and CROP.TO (Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PDF.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while CROP.TO is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PDF.TO returned 18.64%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for CROP.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDF.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for CROP.TO.

Performance

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund (CROP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDF.TO achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than CROP.TO's 3.58% return.

PDF.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: 16.53%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 9.50%
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

CROP.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.10%
• YTD: 3.58%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CROP.TO Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund	CA$135.05K	CA$183.63K	CA$411.80K
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	CA$201.50K	CA$240.90K	CA$226.04K

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	20.07%	20.44%	13.61%	4.13%	-1.74%	5.40%
CROP.TO Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund	3.58%	8.10%	12.74%	6.36%	-5.82%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PDF.TO and CROP.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021	0.26

The correlation between PDF.TO and CROP.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDF.TO

PDF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PDF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PDF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CROP.TO

CROP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
CROP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CROP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CROP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CROP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CROP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund (CROP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDF.TO	CROP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	2.73	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.81	4.10	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.52	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	9.40	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.86	25.52	-1.66

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is higher than the CROP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDF.TO and CROP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDF.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than CROP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDF.TO and CROP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDF.TO	CROP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.00%	-8.68%	-27.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-0.91%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	-4.10%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.21%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-2.42%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	0.34%	+1.06%

Volatility

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund (CROP.TO) at 0.61%. This indicates that PDF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDF.TO	CROP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.48%	0.61%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	1.85%	+5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.38%	3.16%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.33%	4.41%	+5.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	4.41%	+9.17%

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDF.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CROP.TO's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDF.TO vs. CROP.TO - Dividend Comparison

PDF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CROP.TO's 5.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CROP.TO Purpose Credit Opportunities Fund	5.44%	5.48%	5.61%	5.96%	5.97%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	2.79%	3.49%	3.82%	4.17%	3.77%	3.19%	3.84%	3.65%	4.33%	3.50%	3.38%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDF.TO and CROP.TO in my portfolio?

PDF.TO and CROP.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PDF.TO or CROP.TO?

On fees, PDF.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDF.TO or CROP.TO?

PDF.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for CROP.TO.

What is the main difference between PDF.TO and CROP.TO?

PDF.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CROP.TO is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PDF.TO and 1.97% for CROP.TO.