PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PDF.TO (Purpose Core Dividend Fund) and CMVP.TO (HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units) are both exchange-traded funds - PDF.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while CMVP.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index. PDF.TO is actively managed, while CMVP.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, PDF.TO returned 33.26% vs 32.12% for CMVP.TO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDF.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for CMVP.TO.

Performance

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDF.TO achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly higher than CMVP.TO's 18.68% return.

PDF.TO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: 16.53%
• YTD: 20.07%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: 9.50%
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

CMVP.TO

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 1.92%
• 6M: 13.49%
• YTD: 18.68%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units	CA$769.19K	CA$841.17K	CA$642.20K
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	CA$201.50K	CA$240.90K	CA$226.04K

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	20.07%	17.45%
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units	18.68%	21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PDF.TO and CMVP.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025	0.79

The correlation between PDF.TO and CMVP.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDF.TO

PDF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PDF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PDF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CMVP.TO

CMVP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
CMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CMVP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CMVP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CMVP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CMVP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDF.TO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.99	3.22	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.81	4.35	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.58	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	4.52	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.86	20.35	+3.51

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.99, which is comparable to the CMVP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDF.TO and CMVP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDF.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than CMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDF.TO and CMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDF.TO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.00%	-8.86%	-27.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.35%	-7.14%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.09%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-1.01%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	1.58%	-0.18%

Volatility

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units (CMVP.TO) have volatilities of 2.48% and 2.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDF.TO	CMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.48%	2.40%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	8.10%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.38%	10.01%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.33%	10.88%	-0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	10.88%	+2.70%

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDF.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CMVP.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDF.TO vs. CMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

PDF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than CMVP.TO's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMVP.TO HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Dividend Index ETF Class E Units	2.58%	2.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	2.79%	3.49%	3.82%	4.17%	3.77%	3.19%	3.84%	3.65%	4.33%	3.50%	3.38%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDF.TO and CMVP.TO in my portfolio?

PDF.TO and CMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PDF.TO or CMVP.TO?

On fees, CMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDF.TO or CMVP.TO?

CMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PDF.TO.

What is the main difference between PDF.TO and CMVP.TO?

PDF.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CMVP.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PDF.TO and 0.00% for CMVP.TO.