PDEZX vs. DAADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDEZX (PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund) and DAADX (DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, PDEZX returned 27.86%/yr vs 27.34%/yr for DAADX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDEZX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DAADX.

Performance

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEZX achieves a 34.32% return, which is significantly lower than DAADX's 38.15% return.

PDEZX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.26%
• YTD: 34.32%
• 6M: 35.36%
• 1Y: 49.85%
• 3Y*: 27.86%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

DAADX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 11.42%
• YTD: 38.15%
• 6M: 42.63%
• 1Y: 65.14%
• 3Y*: 27.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PDEZX PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund	34.32%	14.88%	18.48%	16.12%	-41.65%	-10.10%
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	38.15%	27.59%	3.44%	24.58%	-15.81%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PDEZX and DAADX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021	0.76

The correlation between PDEZX and DAADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PDEZX vs. DAADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDEZX

PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 58
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DAADX

DAADX Risk / Return Rank: 94
DAADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DAADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DAADX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
DAADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DAADX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) and DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDEZX	DAADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	3.78	-1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	4.64	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.72	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	5.02	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.51	19.97	-7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the DAADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEZX and DAADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDEZX	DAADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	3.78	-1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.06	-0.65

Drawdowns

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEZX drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, which is greater than DAADX's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEZX and DAADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDEZX	DAADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.95%	-24.98%	-29.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.94%	-13.14%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.92%	-18.78%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	0.00%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.23%	-6.75%	-13.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	3.29%	+0.75%

Volatility

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio (DAADX) at 7.97%. This indicates that PDEZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDEZX	DAADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.45%	7.97%	+1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.85%	15.52%	+4.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.62%	17.47%	+6.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	14.58%	+8.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.25%	14.58%	+7.67%

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDEZX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DAADX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDEZX vs. DAADX - Dividend Comparison

PDEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than DAADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAADX DFA Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity Portfolio	1.81%	2.28%	2.64%	2.82%	3.02%	0.30%
PDEZX PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund	1.64%	2.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDEZX and DAADX in my portfolio?

PDEZX and DAADX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDEZX or DAADX?

PDEZX has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to DAADX (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEZX dropped -54.95% vs DAADX's -24.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.