PDEC vs. PAPR
PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PDEC tracks the S&P 500 while PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDEC returned 8.41%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for PAPR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PDEC vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.18% return.
PDEC
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 4.77% | 12.91% | 9.46% | 17.43% | -5.95% | 9.59% | 8.45% | 1.58% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.18% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDEC and PAPR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PDEC and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
PDEC vs. PAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDEC
PAPR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PDEC
PAPR
Financial Services
PDEC
PAPR
Communication Services
PDEC
PAPR
Consumer Cyclical
PDEC
PAPR
Healthcare
PDEC
PAPR
Industrials
PDEC
PAPR
Consumer Defensive
PDEC
PAPR
Energy
PDEC
PAPR
Utilities
PDEC
PAPR
Real Estate
PDEC
PAPR
Basic Materials
PDEC
PAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDEC vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PDEC
PAPR
PDEC vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDEC | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 2.06 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 17.50 | -14.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.03 | 77.47 | -59.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDEC | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 4.34 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 1.01 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
PDEC vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than PAPR's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDEC | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -15.31% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -0.83% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.77% | -11.87% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.53% | -11.87% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.71% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -1.57% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.19% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PDEC vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 1.05%. This indicates that PDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDEC | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.05% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.06% | 2.55% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.83% | 3.36% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 8.21% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 9.44% | +1.52% |
PDEC vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PDEC and PAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PDEC vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PDEC nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDEC and PAPR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDEC has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to PAPR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs PAPR's -15.31%.
On 5-year performance, PDEC leads with 8.41% vs 8.26% for PAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PDEC has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDEC and PAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PDEC and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PDEC tracks S&P 500, while PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDEC and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer